• Todd Barlow, executive director of the Kentucky Corn Growers Association
• Mark Haney, a Pulaski County fruit and cattle farmer and first vice president of the Kentucky Farm Bureau
• Stephen Bartlett, coordinator of Sustainable Agriculture of Louisville and a member of the Jefferson County chapter of the Community Farm Alliance
• Norman Harned, a lawyer, a Nelson County cattle farmer, and a member of the Kentucky Cattlemen’s Association

This is not the normal group of pundits you find on big media and their viewpoints were interesting. Some of the things I learned were:

1. 20% of the corn production is going to ethanol plants. This is the excess production that might have gone overseas or could have been used to maintain low corn prices for cattle fattening.
2. There are two products from the ethanol plants, ethanol and animal feed. The animal feed portion of the ethanol product mix is rarely mentioned by big media since it is a new market. This animal feed might reduce some of the price pressure in the chicken and hog feed markets.
3. The production of ethanol is probably reducing the prices we pay for gasoline prices by 10%. It is my guess that ethanol is a more cost effective octane enhancer than those base on crude oil. I am not sure what petroleum based chemical ethanol competes with since I think benzene and MTBE have been removed from the market due to carcinogenic issues.
4. No one was surprised that the price of corn and the other grains exploded. It seems that everyone there had been through previous booms and busts of the agriculture business. They had seen the symptoms of a boom before. The dramatic increase in corn prices affected most grains. The cost increases are related to the combined effects of ethanol, crude oil increases, inventories, and the weather. Everyone expects that there will be wide swings in prices until these price pressures sort themselves out.
5. Everyone was curious how the ethanol market will fare without government subsidies.
6. Everyone viewed corn as a transitional feedstock for ethanol production. There was a lot of speculation about new ethanol feedstocks and everyone thought that if the market lasted long enough it would sort out the winners from the losers. There was a lot of hope in celloustic ethanol using corn stalks, corn cobs, and other low value byproducts of farming. The primary ethanol feedstock source will probably vary by agricultural region. As an example sugar cane stalks would be a likely ethanol source in sugar growing regions.
7. Everyone was curious how we could lower fuel costs in ethanol production. Most of the questions on whether ethanol results in a positive or negative energy balance to society hinged on the cost of fuel used to harvest and transport ethanol feedstocks.This problem remains even if corn is not used as the primary feedstock.

Related posts:

1. Robert Shiller Interview Housing Prices   Shiller is not certain the housing market has bottomed,...
2. The Myth of ‘Market Failure’ in Health Care Eighteen years ago when my son was born I came...
3. Will the Government Option Increase Health Care Competitiveness? One of the interesting ironies of the government option in...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

BLACKSBURG, Va., February 19, 2008 — A Virginia Tech student has created a floor lamp powered by gravity.

Clay Moulton of Springfield, Va., who received his master of science degree in architecture (concentration in industrial design) from the College of Architecture and Urban Studies in 2007, created the lamp when he was an industrial design graduate student. The light-emitting diode (LED) lamp, named Gravia, has just won second place in the Greener Gadgets Design Competition as part of the Greener Gadgets Conference in New York City.

This is a pretty cool story from my alma mater. Click here to read the rest of the story Lamp lit by gravity wins Greener Gadget award.

Related posts:

1. A Thought Experiment for Scientists With all of the talk about the Climategate emails I...
2. The Best Jokes about Obama and the 2016 Olympic games selection The best jokes about the IOC selection of Rio for...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

What is needed is for the Congress to pass a law requiring that all new cars sold in the United States be flex-fueled – able to run on any combination of alcohol or gasoline fuel. Such cars are existing technology – in fact about 24 different models of flex-fuel cars were produced by the Detroit Big Three in 2007, and they only cost about $100 more than the same car in a gasoline-only version. But, since alcohol fuel pumps (such as E85, a fuel mix that is 85 percent ethanol, 15 percent gasoline) are nearly as rare as unicorns, flex-fuel cars only command about 3 percent of the new-car market.

SPEAKOUT: Flex-fuel cars can break OPEC : Speakout : The Rocky Mountain News

Zubrin’s plan got me thinking. We have an E85 pump at the new Kroger that I pass each day. I have been told that the lower miles per gallon for the flex fuel vehicles makes them more costly to run. With the recent publicity I got to wondering what the numbers really say. I have a 2000 Subaru Forester that might make an interesting test subject. Hmm…

Without too much problem I found a company that specializes in the conversion kits, Fuel Flex International, LLC. They have a kit for $369.99. For a guy who lives on a farm it looks like a relatively simple job. Since I am an engineer by training I think I will record my fuel consumption, mileage, and cost over the next two weeks to establish a baseline. Since the E85 pump is nearby to where I normally fill up I will log its price, too. At the end of two weeks I will probably have a pretty good idea how the numbers are working out.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.