Ten Commandment challenges spread

The disputes are part of a national debate over how entangled religion and government can be. [Christian Science Monitor]

In contrast, in mid-July a federal judge in La Crosse, Wis., ordered the city to remove a Ten Commandments monument from a city park because, she said, it made some community members “feel they were not welcome, that they did not belong in La Crosse unless they followed Judeo-Christian traditions.” The monument had been there since 1965.

“The First Amendment guarantees persons of all faiths that the government will treat them with equal concern and respect,” wrote US District Judge Barbara Crabb.

I am fascinated who those community members are. It appears that these community members are more comfortable with murder and robbery than a Ten Commandments monument that they can ignore.  I can see where these people would be uncomfortable with religion being pushed down their throats but I do not see how a Ten Commandments monument pushes religion. They are not going to get follow up phone calls from a monument.  The Ten Commandments are some of the moral foundations our legal system are built upon. That is not going to change. Many faiths share these same values. The primary purpose of Ten Commandment monuments is to focus our attention on the concept of right and wrong. That is why you see these monuments and displays primarily at courthouses and schools. If a monument stops just one person from committing a crime, it is worth it!

A picture named heinlein.gifRobert Heinlein: “An artist can look at a pretty girl and see the old woman she will become. A better artist can look at an old woman and see the pretty girl she used to be. A great artist can look at an old woman, portray her exactly as she is, and force the viewer to se the pretty girl she used to be, more than that, he can make anyone with the sensitivity of an armadillo see that this lovely young girl is still alive, prisoned inside her ruined body. He can make you feel the quiet endless tragedy that there was never a girl born who ever grew older than eighteen in her heart.” [Scripting News]

Dsclient and Norton Anti-Virus Fix on Windows 98

The latest verion of Norton Anti-Virus 2003 on a W98 box is incompatible with DSCLIENT and the Web Proxy provided by M$ ISA. When I first installed NAV it was partially incompatible. I kept getting a page fault in Negotiat.dll but I could minimize the problem by disabling Liveupdate. NAV ran but I had to perform a manual Liveupdate. After the latest update it is completely incompatible. NAV did not run at all. So I went searching for a real fix. I found it in a knowlegebase article on M$ which recommended not using Web Proxy. It said the problem is with trying to use DSCLIENT to authenticate your http access. Instead it recommended coding the browser for firewall access which is non-authenticated. To make this work I had to remove the Web Proxy.