The Mediated Man, David Brooks versus Thomas Paine

Commonsense-153pxYesterday I read David Brooks editorial about the mediated man and his allegation that because Mr. Snowden’s life is “unshaped by the mediating institutions of civil society”, Mr. Snowden sees his battle as that between  “the solitary naked individual and the gigantic and menacing state” and that he would be “more likely to share the distinct strands of libertarianism that are blossoming in this fragmenting age”. Since I had just read Thomas Paine’s “Common Sense” on Sunday, I was surprised with his analysis. It is as if Mr. Brooks borrowed the idea of mediating institutions from “Common Sense” and then promptly forgot that Thomas Paine used this “common sense” to argue against the absurdities of British rule. Thomas Paine did not mince his words. He was at least as vehement about the absurdities of British rule as Mr. Snowden has been about the absurdities of blanket data gathering by the U. S. government. Here is the opening paragraph of “Common Sense”.

SOME writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different, but have different origins. Society is produced by our wants, and government by wickedness; the former promotes our happiness POSITIVELY by uniting our affections, the latter NEGATIVELY by restraining our vices. The one encourages intercourse, the other creates distinctions. The first is a patron, the last a punisher.

“Common Sense” was popular in 1776 because common people could hold two common sense thoughts in their minds at the same time. For many of them their life was “embedded in a series of gently gradated authoritative structures: family, neighborhood, religious group, state, nation and world” and yet at the same time, they were very concerned about abuses by the British government. Their response surprised many of the pundits of that day since it was both measured and civil to “the gigantic and menacing state”. I guess that it is not surprising that Mr. Brooks would make the same mistake. Random acts of violence was no longer a solution for the common man. Within a short period of time this common sense argument had initiated a public debate about independence from England which resulted in the Declaration of Independence.  For today’s generation Mr. Snowden is their voice just like Mr. Ellsberg  was the voice of the Viet Nam war generation.

Here is the part of the David Brooks article I quoted.

If you live a life unshaped by the mediating institutions of civil society, perhaps it makes sense to see the world a certain way: Life is not embedded in a series of gently gradated authoritative structures: family, neighborhood, religious group, state, nation and world. Instead, it’s just the solitary naked individual and the gigantic and menacing state.

This lens makes you more likely to share the distinct strands of libertarianism that are blossoming in this fragmenting age: the deep suspicion of authority, the strong belief that hierarchies and organizations are suspect, the fervent devotion to transparency, the assumption that individual preference should be supreme. You’re more likely to donate to the Ron Paul for president campaign, as Snowden did….